Recommendations

Deterministic, evidence-backed fixes for Nutricost - generated from collected data, no guesswork.

What to do · 4 moves

0/4 done

Not visible for 13 high-intent Creatine queries

Nutricost is never mentioned in 13 shopper queries where competitors appear - likely a PDP/content gap. Prioritize content and product pages targeting these questions.

Absent: "best creatine for endurance runners"

Absent: "best creatine for older adults to preserve muscle mass"

Absent: "best creatine for strength and power output"

Absent: "best creatine gummies"

Absent: "best creatine with no fillers or additives"

Earn placement on the sources AI trusts for Creatine

AI grounds Creatine recommendations in these domains. Getting Nutricost reviewed/listed there raises the odds of being recommended.

healthline.com - cited in 7% of citations

pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov - cited in 6% of citations

youtube.com - cited in 4% of citations

Mentioned but rarely first (avg rank 3.3)

Nutricost appears in 25% of Creatine answers but ranks first only 2% of the time. Strengthen differentiators (third-party testing, clinical backing) so AI leads with Nutricost.

SoV 25% · first-mention 2% · avg rank 3.3

Competitors win on 3 attributes where Nutricost is outranked

In Creatine answers where Nutricost ranks below a competitor, higher-ranked brands are credited with these attributes. Where Nutricost lacks one, add it; where it has one, get it surfaced so AI attributes it to Nutricost.

NSF certified - a higher-ranked competitor has it in 56% of answers where Nutricost is outranked

Third-party tested - a higher-ranked competitor has it in 50% of answers where Nutricost is outranked

Informed Sport/Choice - a higher-ranked competitor has it in 39% of answers where Nutricost is outranked